This lot round here, no more than an 8-mile-radius, today and yesterday;
H1 2AKY (ZAKY?), J4W DR (a dentist maybe?), T700 RON (he must be called Ron!),
TO02 JAN (Let me guess! She must be Jan!)
A11BY B, L100 MUM, CCC 22, ROG1E
S4NDY, 2LEY, K9REN,
B11XUM (good one this! I wonder what she’s like? How big are her breasts?)
M85 6LAM (it’s meant to look like “Mrs Glam”, I’ve seen her…..)
And in this afternoon,
SI’5 TOY, K300RYN, X 8ARY, and…..
LJ52 LEE (I thought that Theodore Dalrymple said that 50% of all men called “Lee” are in Prison)…and…
CI-IYLL, X 14YNE (the “I” had a bottomleft-serif on it)
G Y02SEF (Good! The cargo-cult of numberplates is spreading; maybe The West will win the War after all.) He’s always outside the same house. I know where he works, what he sells, what car he drives (of course) and how well his takeaways are doing.
I still wonder why, libertarian considerations about the goodandrightness and theoretical harmlessness of advertising one’s individuality apart, people still do it. And yet do it in such a way that you CAN work out who they are, where they live, and stuff?
And when you can find out in short order where they live, by driving around for a few weeks, after two or three sightings of their car(s)? In a Police State? Where criminals for example are routed by the
absence of the Police to the right houses to burgle in Formby (for example only!) ??
The mass of the Poles got by under communism by being as anonymous as possible. With the coming Dark Age, coupled with the threat of state-identity-granting/management, I owuld have thought that any advertisement of your selfhood was to be avoided.
Or have I missed something vital?