What the Media Won’t Report About Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17


The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity

What the Media Won’t Report About Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17

Rep. Ron Paul, July 21, 2014

Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash!

While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report.

They will not report that the crisis in Ukraine started late last year, when EU and US-supported protesters plotted the overthrow of the elected Ukrainian president, Viktor Yanukovych. Without US-sponsored “regime change,” it is unlikely that hundreds would have been killed in the unrest that followed. Nor would the Malaysian Airlines crash have happened.

The media has reported that the plane must have been shot down by Russian forces or Russian-backed separatists, because the missile that reportedly brought down the plane was Russian made. But they will not report that the Ukrainian government also uses the exact same Russian-made weapons.

They will not report that the post-coup government in Kiev has, according to OSCE monitors, killed 250 people in the breakaway Lugansk region since June, including 20 killed as government forces bombed the city center the day after the plane crash! Most of these are civilians and together they roughly equal the number killed in the plane crash. By contrast, Russia has killed no one in Ukraine, and the separatists have struck largely military, not civilian, targets.

They will not report that the US has strongly backed the Ukrainian government in these attacks on civilians, which a State Department spokeswoman called “measured and moderate.”

They will not report that neither Russia nor the separatists in eastern Ukraine have anything to gain but everything to lose by shooting down a passenger liner full of civilians.

They will not report that the Ukrainian government has much to gain by pinning the attack on Russia, and that the Ukrainian prime minister has already expressed his pleasure that Russia is being blamed for the attack.

They will not report that the missile that apparently shot down the plane was from a sophisticated surface-to-air missile system that requires a good deal of training that the separatists do not have.

They will not report that the separatists in eastern Ukraine have inflicted considerable losses on the Ukrainian government in the week before the plane was downed.

They will not report how similar this is to last summer’s US claim that the Assad government in Syria had used poison gas against civilians in Ghouta. Assad was also gaining the upper hand in his struggle with US-backed rebels and the US claimed that the attack came from Syrian government positions. Then, US claims led us to the brink of another war in the Middle East. At the last minute public opposition forced Obama to back down – and we have learned since then that US claims about the gas attack were false.

Of course it is entirely possible that the Obama administration and the US media has it right this time, and Russia or the separatists in eastern Ukraine either purposely or inadvertently shot down this aircraft. The real point is, it’s very difficult to get accurate information so everybody engages in propaganda. At this point it would be unwise to say the Russians did it, the Ukrainian government did it, or the rebels did it. Is it so hard to simply demand a real investigation?

 

 

 

About these ads

2 responses to “What the Media Won’t Report About Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17

  1. There is no one by the name of “Ron Paul” who is a member of the United States House of Representatives. Although the use of honorific former titles is a common practice in the United States.

    There was a Congressman Ron Paul – who got into trouble over various things published under his name (for example anti-Semitic ravings published in the “Ron Paul Newsletter”). Former Congressman Ron Paul explained that a lot of the stuff published under his name he had never even seen – let alone wrote.

    It is to be hoped that this article (with its terrible stuff about the Ukraine and Syria) is an another example of something that the retired Congressman has never seen (let alone wrote).

    However, the use of his name is a problem for his son Senator Rand Paul – who may well run for the Presidency.

    If Senator Rand Paul is to have any chance thing this practice (the practice of nutters being allowed to publish under the name of former Congressman Ron Paul) has to be stopped.

    By the way Senator – scrubbing off your website exactly which Church you go to in Bowling Green Kentucky, is not going to work.

    Just removing the denomination from the website does not mean that people can not find out which church you and your wife belong to (it did not make me long to find out).

    You are going to have to face up to this problem (and to the “Ron Paul” problem – whoever is writing under his name).

    Otherwise you will sink at the Iowa Caucus.

  2. To be specific – one can oppose both intervention in Syria and in the Ukraine, without writing this sort of article.

    Although I am NOT claiming that Ron Paul wrote this – or has even seen it.