by Stewart Cowan
The UK’s Most Radical Revolutionaries are in Government
I look forward to reading Frank Davis’s blog every morning. Yesterday, he wrote that while the mainstream media paint UKIP as the revolutionaries, it’s actually the so-called mainstream parties who are,
After all, with a few exceptions, the political class is now fully signed up to merging the UK into Europe. After 1000 years or more of being a nation-state, it’s all going to be replaced with membership of the brand new European Union. And this is an extremely radical departure. It’s nothing short of a revolution. And it wasn’t being seriously contemplated just 40 years ago, when the EU was still the European Economic Community.
Same with global warming/climate change. The political class has signed up for all that as well, with all the mainstream parties vying to be more green than each other. Yet 20 years ago nobody believed that the climate was warming at all. So that’s another extremely radical departure.
And then there’s the smoking ban. The political class supports that too. None of the mainstream parties is even hinting at any change in that. Instead they’re pressing on with more bans – e.g. in cars. And yet not 10 years ago, nobody imagined that it would soon be impossible to sit in a pub and drink a pint of beer and smoke a cigarette. I certainly couldn’t. So that’s yet another extremely radical departure.
And there’s more. There’s large scale immigration, unthinkable 60 or 70 years ago. And now gay marriage, unthinkable 20 years ago.
In the past, radicals used to be in minority protest groups on the fringes of society. But now the radicals are all in government. So in Europe there’s Manuel Barroso, a one-time Maoist. And Catherine Ashton, a one-time CND activist. And there are lots more of them with similar histories.
I suppose that, for people of a radical or ‘progressive’ mentality, it all looks like great stuff. But not everybody is a radical or a ‘progressive’, particularly if the actual ‘progress’ doesn’t seem to be any sort of real progress at all.
‘Progressive’ simply means that changes are desired, but naturally, socialists pretend or genuinely believe that these changes are positive ones, but history is showing the ‘progressive’ agenda is highly destructive.
I commented that Cameron, Clegg and Milipede should have hats with red stars on them. The big question is why? The ones at the top know what the Agenda is about and the ordinary constituency MP tends to be a compliant drone (I’ve met a few) who cannot discuss matters with you one man to another, but spews out doctrine parrot-fashion, like they’re on Question Time.
The only sensible answers I ever got from a politician was from Ian Paisley just a few years ago – I think he was an MP, MEP and MLA at the time, as well as being a (religious) minister! I asked him after a church meeting (I’m not a member of his church, but I used to go to the local branch occasionally and one day he was there to install the new minister) what he thought of manmade climate change and he went into one (as he’s famous for). “It’s a load of complete nonsense….”
Apart from that outburst, he was relaxed and spoke freely. You could tell he is his own man and not the usual political clone.
What do ‘they’ have on Cameron to make him so *radical*? Do they pay him vast sums in brown envelopes or more likely, did they set him up as a paedophile years ago so they could use him as a bigger puppet even than Blair? Just what makes these people prepared to do so much damage to their own country and people. Take the recent flooding in Somerset, for example. largely avoidable, were it not for our membership of the EU.
Take any number of things. The overtaxing and waste. The bans and control. The cultural subversion.
Obama, I see as a once hopeless chav/spiv, bereft of values, who was crafted to become the irresistible destroyer of the USA.
The Common Purpose operatives and fake charity astroturfers obviously have their agendas. The former want a Marxist-Leninist country and the latter are unhealthily obsessed with what other people do and so want to control them.
CONTROL is the operative word in all of this.
Exile them to the outdoors (Deborah Arnott of ASH) or tax them until they can’t feed themselves. Subvert their country so there won’t be enough people to rise up to defend their values. Destroy religion and introduce moral relativity, so people have trouble working out what’s right and wrong anyway, so they just do what the telly tells them and take their cues from their heroes, be they rockers, rappers, sports ‘stars’ or (haha) politicians.
But the really stupid ones will always believe the BBC and Guardian, etc. that UKIP are racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic etc.
I’m considering getting a place in the middle of nowhere and living off-grid. It’ll probably be the only way to survive: to eat and heat. And as far away from officialdom as possible. And as far away from hordes of people who will raid your garden/smallholding!
Because you can tell what’s going to happen in the future by looking at what the fake charities and unelected government advisors are advocating. Take “Forum for the Future”:
More of that sustainability = depopulation and total control grid. Here’s one of their ‘scenario’ videos about life in 2040. You’ll get an electric bike if you’re fortunate enough and meat on your birthday. You’ll be allocated a profession. If you own a car you’ll be forced to share it on journeys to work. Those who don’t comply will live in ghettos.
It’s already been planned – and more that they dare not yet divulge. It’ll happen. Watch the video. It’s the future.