Despicable Brits target Glenn Greenwald’s partner


http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/08/18/theyre-going-after-greenwald/

Note: Something Justin fails to understand is that Mr Miranda was plainly guilty of Being Brazilian in or near London. The authorities take a very strict view of this offence. The normal punishment is to be held down in an underground railway carriage and shot to death by unidentified police officers. He got off lightly in my view. SIG

They’re Going After Greenwald:
Despicable Brits target Glenn Greenwald’s partner
by Justin Raimondo, August 19, 2013

 

This time they’ve gone too far.

The enemies of liberty have escalated their attack on Glenn Greenwald – the Guardian journalist whose reporting on Edward Snowden’s revelations has provoked an international movement against the Surveillance State – in a way even I never thought possible. They have targeted his longtime partner, David Miranda: en route home to Brazil, where he and Greenwald presently reside, Miranda passed through London’s Heathrow Airport, where he was detained by officers and questioned for nine hours. They claimed authority to do so under the terms of the “Terrorism Act 2000,” which allows them to detain terrorist suspects at airports and border crossings at will. Miranda had been visiting friends in Berlin. After confiscating his laptops, his cell phone, and all electronics, they finally let him go.

From news accounts of what happened at Heathrow, it looks as if the Brits dearly wanted to arrest him, or at least get clearance to hold him longer – and only the energetic efforts of the Brazilian embassy managed to just barely get Miranda out of there and home to a free country.

As of this writing, we don’t know exactly what the interrogation entailed, but it isn’t hard to imagine: Miranda had been staying with Laura Poitras, the American documentary filmmaker who has been instrumental in Greenwald’s reporting. Poitras has herself been stopped, detained, and interrogated over forty times at various airports in the course of her reporting career, which is outrageous in and of itself, but this latest move by the cretins who rule our destiny is a serious escalation of their attack on the free press. As Glenn pointed out in his amazingly calm account of the matter, “Even the Mafia had ethical rules against targeting the family members of people they feel threatened by.”

Although Greenwald is increasingly the target of a concerted attack on his character and journalistic credentials, the authorities have so far left the dirty work to their journalistic Praetorian Guard, the David Gregorys, the Walter Pincus types, and the Mike Grunwalds of this world. This action by the British government – and does it make me a “conspiracy theorist” to think this was carried out at the direction of their Washington overseers? – crosses a very distinct line, the boundary between a free society that recognizes the rule of law and an authoritarian state that manipulates the law to serve its own purposes.

Miranda is not a journalist. His identity and his relationship to Glenn has only recently been revealed by the spotlight shown on his partner: a recent New York Times profile of Ms. Poitras was set in the Miranda-Greenwald household, in Brazil, when Poitras was visiting. To target Miranda is to cross into Soviet territory: the KGB, in their war on dissidents, also victimized loved ones, often sending entire families to the gulag.

By citing the “Terrorism Act” as justification for their actions, the Brits violated their own procedures, as this paragraph from their Code of Practice makes clear:

“The purpose of questioning and associated powers is to determine whether a person appears to be someone who is or has been concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism. The powers, which are additional to the powers of arrest under the Act, should not be used for any other purpose.”

What have Miranda and Greenwald to do with “terrorism”? Are the Brits (and, standing behind them, the Americans) saying that he – and, by implication, Greenwald – is affiliated with or sympathetic to some Al-Qaeda-like group, and is actively involved in plotting terrorists acts? Of course not. What they are saying is that anyone involved in the practice of real journalism – as opposed to the professional shills like David Gregory and Walter Pincus – and who exposes their secret machinations will be dealt with by any “legal” means necessary.

The message to journalists everywhere is ominous indeed: if you report things the US government and/or its overseas vassals don’t like, not only you but your loved ones will be unmercifully harassed and quite possibly arrested until we make you stop. How is this different from what Josef Stalin, Saddam Hussein, and other world-infamous despots did to earn a prominent spot in history’s rogues gallery?

This incident was clearly meant as a warning shot aimed directly at Greenwald, who has publicly expressed his desire to return to the United States. He and Miranda have been living in Brazil, up until this point, due to the immigration restrictions previously put on spouses in same-sex relationships. Now that the Supreme Court has decided that straight people have to start treating us like human beings, Glenn has said he intends on returning to the US with Miranda soon rather than later. He has no illusions about the danger he faces. As he told Salon:

“Given that the Obama DOJ has adopted theories that would criminalize journalism in both the WikiLeaks Grand Jury proceeding and the investigation of James Rosen, given that it has waged what most observers agree is an unprecedented war on whistle-blowers, and given that several prominent political figures and journalists have called for my prosecution, I obviously take the risk seriously. But I take more seriously the Constitution’s guarantee of a free press in the First Amendment. So I have every intention of entering the U.S. as soon as my schedule permits and there’s a reason to do so.”

If I were Glenn, I would stay in Brazil: there is no obligation to make oneself a martyr. I say this not because I’m so presumptuous as to offer him public advice on a highly personal matter (although I am that), but in order to make a political point: the guarantees of basic rights enshrined in the Constitution are simply no longer operable. It is admirable to take the Constitution seriously: for that reason, it is necessary to take the enemies of the Constitution just as seriously.

These people mean business – and quite a dirty business it is, too. They don’t care about the rule of law: as Greenwald spent a whole book explaining to us, today the law is applied in a grossly unequal manner, and this degeneration of our legal system has occurred over a long period of years. The vast secret surveillance apparatus he has so thoroughly exposed in his reporting shows this degenerative process is almost complete.

In short, no one is safe – and that is the hallmark of an authoritarian society, now isn’t it? No, not journalists, not the Guardian, not Antiwar.com – our power-crazed political class will stop at nothing to preserve its prerogatives and privileges. And if Greenwald thinks the Constitution will prove to be an obstacle in their path, then why is it that up until now they’ve used it as a doormat?

Nothing short of a revolution is going to stop this power grab: hopefully it will be like that which overthrew the old Soviet Union – relatively bloodless and nonviolent. That’s what I hope for – but I’m not betting the farm on it.

No, it isn’t too late to bring about peaceful change: but the hour is getting damned late. Which is why I fear it is going to take a lot more than a few bills in Congress – or even the victory of civil libertarians at the polls – to derail this coup d’etat against the rule of law and restore the Constitution.

About these ads

6 responses to “Despicable Brits target Glenn Greenwald’s partner

  1. Lynn Atkinson

    Marinade was guilty of living in and on Britain and the British illegally! Now if you don’t mind, you pay!

    Sent from my iPhone

  2. It’s stuff like this that make me wonder about all the people whining about “saving Western Civilisation” as if such a thing existed, let alone what actually happens in UK and USA. Do the cheap seats think this is too much Western Civ or too little?

  3. Western Civilisation certainly exists smartarse. The scum of statism in general and socialism in particular have fucked it up.

    And from the cheap seats the word is :piss up your leg and play with the steam.

    If you don’t mind me a sayin’ so.

  4. Western Civilisation – if you mean the cultural-thing that made more billions of people less wretchedly poor, safer, slightly better medicated when ill, and slightly better fed than their forebears, and with proper music written by dead white men and proper books (same authorship) that are actually about real stuff which a sane reader would want to read about, then yes: it does exist.

    And if you ask who’s trying actively to abolish and destroy it? Why, it’s our old and long-fought-enemies, the GramscoFabiaNazis.

    Hell! Hang it all! They’ve even _said_ that that’s what they want to do.

  5. Apparently the legal word games played by America in order to justify war crimes, torture and all kinds of brutality and spying has been noted by the UK.

    Anyone having, or suspected of having, any information which, if released, could aid terrorist groups or increase the risk to the British people, their operatives or their allies is now subject to the terrorism act. If you have encrypted, or otherwise secured, information then how can plod know whether it might fall under this definition without you showing them the plain version? And maybe you’ve got it stored online, if so you have to give them all your online passwords.

    And if the information you hold is embarrassing to the government (spying on people, torturing Muslims, bombing first responders etc.) then that can obviously stir up some hatred of the US and UK which increases terrorism so obviously you can’t be allowed to release that.

    Rights? Seems to me the only right we now have is to be protected by the state. Not from the state, just by it.

  6. @Ecks and company – Western Civ has clearly failed if it can’t stand up to the fifth column within… must do better next time.