I’d like to say something nice about Michael Foot


…but I can’t.

David Davis

He died today. He was 96: I’d be happy to reach that, but I probably won’t, owing mostly to high living, wild women and too much alcohol drunk while too young.

The problem with socialists is so, so easy to solve. As a human being, you have free will. You can, well, just walk away. Just like people give up smoking or drugs or drinking. In the end, they walk away, or die.

Foot never did. Perhaps the “feminist”  Jill Craigie was just too sexy to shag (I am sorry, I do not know either way) and he never fancied any of the Tories’ (young female) “researchers”. We always knew about “researchers”, and they were always at least vaguely pretty, or even better than that: many of them “had family money”,  and some were even the daughters of “Officers” (these only married “rising stars” and you were of course out of the running big-time – “look, you’re a really really super fun friend…but….”): but we being penniless, we could never get any.

In the end, Foot didn’t walk away – he just became an old socialist. He could not even not wear a “donkey-jacket” to the Cenotaph. Not that it really really matters at all what you wear while paying your respects to the War Dead, so long as you mean it.

But it was, well, just “impolite”. Socialists, ultimately, know that they “are serious” and so they don’t even want to disguise how they despise.

About these ads

7 responses to “I’d like to say something nice about Michael Foot

  1. Mr Foot was a true character, there are no characters today in politics. He will be sadly missed

  2. Paul Robinson

    My late father said about Michael Foot, he was an idiot, but a well-meaning one.

    I know what he meant (my father, that is!)

  3. What is this modern phenomenon of gushing in public about the dead?

    Being a stiff does not make a man a tip-top chap. He was a lefty fruitcake who dishonoured our War dead.

  4. One redeeming feature of Michael Foot is that he was the head honcho of the Tom Paine Society. Yes, that Tom Paine!

    Tony

    • Some socialists, the less unperceptive ones, know this truth. But they can’t, none of them, ever ever ever let grip of their ancient mythological beliefs in the innate horribleness of individual liberty, where it (in say economic issues) cuts across Marx and Lenin.

      And ultimately, intelelctual socialists want the same things as successful people everywhere: a nice home, a library walled with books, a shaggable wife, children who believe what you do and go to “good schools” such as St Paul’s for girls, where they “pressure the pupils”, etc etc etc.

  5. Economics is a murky business. The uncertain backgrounds and conflicting contents make it wise to suspend belief when considering economic propositions.

    BTW: Tom Paine preceded Marx and Lenin by a century or so. When Michael Foot admired Tom Paine, he was admiring a proponent of Guaranteed Basic Incomes. One liberty can often supercede another. Less poverty == More freedom.

    Tony