There shouldn’t need to be all those Policemen there…


not to mention the obscene, nasty barriers.

David Davis

Update by Charles Moore, the Torygraph 14th March 2009

 

So how do you give them flowers then?

So how do you give them flowers then?

What sort of a country are we living in? What the f*** is the matter with this place, and why have the multicultiGramscoFabians done it?  

And why does Islam go along with it? It should know better, since Allah is merciful and good and all-powerful….isn’t he? Isn’t he just Leibnitz’s same God? They Moslems ought to be on our side, against statists.

If they bastard Gramsco-Fabians would have merely let us alone, we could have let them, the blasted wastrels, just live out their functionless lives shagging each other’s wives and daughters amid boring lefty books, if they’d only let us have Capitalism and liberty and let us get on with it. Good triumphs when evil Men do nothing: all they had to do was…nothing, and everything would be fine.

Why do socialists want to ruin our world, as well as their own? I think it’s a mental disorder, and they should be sectioned.

About these ads

8 responses to “There shouldn’t need to be all those Policemen there…

  1. Tristan Mills

    Why would you give them flowers?
    They signed up to murder people at the state’s behest.

    They are not defending their homes, family and community, they are partaking in foreign adventurism.

    The military is nothing to do with a free capitalist world, it is part of the oppressive state world of the authoritarians of the left and of the right.

  2. Their wives and children might want to give them flowers, Tristan, and possibly even in public too. They and their soldier-family-members are people too.

    They do not become monsters (even if so in your eyes) just because they have helped to further the foreign policy – if you can dignify it with that term – of a bunch of socialist scumbags in Westminster and elsewhere.

    In a free capitalist world, there would be no need for “the military”. But we do not live in such a one right now. In the eyes of the protesters, “the military” – and in _especial case the British one_ – represents one of the last powerful institutions ranged __against the Enemy Class__ (read Sean Gabb, I am sure you have done already.)

    The public standing and the internal morale of the British Military __must be degraded__ if the Fabian project is to succeed.

    You surely understand this?

  3. Bertrand Russell got it right when he wrote that nice people only sleep safely in their beds because rough men are ready to do violence on their behalf.

    Part of our problem in Britain is that while almost every other part of the British state has hypertrophied, the police have been misdirected against the British people and the armed forces have been under-resourced and undermined at every opportunity.

    If you believe that there will one day be no need for a military, you are engaged in religious rather than political discourse.

    Follow two simple rules of thumb. If the Enemy Class are for something, we should be against it, unless we have satisfied ourselves that there are strong reasons to be in favour of it. If the Enemy Class are against something, we should be for it, unless we have satisfied ourselves taht there are strong reason to be against it.

  4. We may get there Otto …. one day. But as Aragorn in TLOTR part 3 said at the battle outside the Black Gate (another context of course)…

    “Today is not this day”.

  5. David, Lord of the Rings really inspires me – the struggle of good against evil. Just a shame we have no Gandalf, no Eldar and no hobbits to help us!

    (Incidentally, Wormtongue so reminds me of New Labour spindoctors in general, and one of them in particular. I’ll leave which one as an exercise for the reader.)

  6. “Rough men…” I think it was Orwell who said that. Although Orwell himself took part in a few wars, so he may be biased.

    There are valid arguments about how the army should be funded, but I think that a war to bring freedom to oppressed people should nevertheless be applauded by anyone who believes in liberty as a moral principle and human right, rather than an economic good to be bought – by anyone whose liberal motivation is not solely for their own personal freedom.

    Self-interest is, of course, a surer motivator, but freedom is a prerequisite for a free market to exist, not itself a product to be bought at market. How can a slave with no power buy their freedom in the first place? It is a locked box with the key inside.

    And who are ‘we’? With who do we identify for ‘self-defence’? My nation/tribe/tax-jurisdiction, my friends and family, or all believers in freedom?

    We owe others our own freedom, who we cannot ever repay. If freedom does not grow, it will die. If we are not willing to make an effort to liberate others, why should anyone come to our aid when the tyrants come to our lands?

    No blind approval, and we can argue about their methods; but so long as they are killing tyrants, I don’t much care at whose behest they do so. We need to get our priorities straight. Destroying all those like the Taliban should come first. We can dismantle the state after that’s done.

  7. “Bertrand Russell got it right when he wrote that nice people only sleep safely in their beds because rough men are ready to do violence on their behalf.”

    MI5 has that thesis as their semi-official self-justification…

    Tony

  8. And why does Islam go along with it? It should know better, since Allah is merciful and good and all-powerful….isn’t he? Isn’t he just Leibnitz’s same God? They Moslems ought to be on our side, against statists.
    End quote.

    Islam is not the retarded child-like idiotized thugs they are believed to be. They spot those of danger to Islam – and, certainly Libertarians are as poisonous to Islam as they was formerly to Christianity – because Libertarianism would go out of it’s way to crush Allah, destroy faith in the supranatural. That’s what your Libby forebears did to Christianity, wouldn’t you say. It’s why the Muslims fight so hard – they see the West for what it is. Rather nasty, amoral, depraved and introverted to the point of social retardation & national destruction.

    It’s why I fear the Muslims will win in the great civilisation race; faith plus a high birth rate.