Nick Griffin v the “Anti-Fascist” Anti-Semites


Blackburn Demo from BNPtv on Vimeo.

This link sees to work:-

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/01/the-muslim-march-the-bbc-didn%e2%80%99t-let-you-see-2/

The Libertarian Allisnce has learned that he following letter has today (17th January 2009) been emailed and posted to Chief Constable Steve Finnigan at Lancashire Police HQ, Preston.

For Urgent Attention, Chief Constable, Lancashire Constabulary
Police HQ
Hutton
Preston
PR4 5SB

17th January 2009

Dear Chief Constable Finnigan,

I wish to make a formal allegation of incitement to racial hatred, contrary to S.5 of the Public Order Act, whereby it is an offence to use words intended or, having regards to all the circumstances, likely to incite racial hatred.

The offence was, I believe, committed by Lauren Booth in the course of her speech to the Muslims for Gaza rally in Corporation Park, Blackburn, on Sunday 11th January 2009, a copy of which may be found on the BNPtv footage posted together with my analysis of the speech and situation on the main news section of www.bnp.org.uk on Saturday 17th January.

As you should already be aware, this rally was attended by many thousands of mainly young Muslim men, already in a high state of anger as a result of media coverage of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict in Gaza. As one of Britain’s leading experts in this particular piece of legislation, I have no doubt whatsoever that there is a prima facie case against Ms Booth. In particular, her use of the plural in the phrase “you are the criminals we detest”, juxtaposed with comments such as “we want Israel out of this country”, (not, please note, “the Israeli Embassy”, but simply “Israel”) are clearly likely – if not intended – to be taken by those present as a green light for hatred, indeed quite possibly actual physical violence, against individual Jews and against Jewish businesses in our High Streets.

That she intended mischief is indicated by her deliberately setting out to enrage the audience with stories – totally fictitious as far as any news reports coming out of Gaza would suggest – of “chemical weapons” being used by Israel in the targeted attacks on Hamas terrorists which she presents as random attacks aimed at innocent women and children.

Given the deep-rooted traditional hostility to Jews, simply on account of their being Jews, in the Koran and the Haddith, to make such a speech to a large Muslim audience can only incite hatred against Jews; the legal threshold of ‘likelihood’ cannot fail to be crossed.

If it should be that a ‘softly softly’ policing policy meant that you did not feel able to station a police video team in the park to capture speeches as evidence in the event (clearly foreseeable under the circumstances) of incitements to violence or racial or religious hatred, then you only need to ask and BNPtv will supply you with the original footage recorded by our camera crew in the park. Although it is shaky it is clearly audible throughout and the speaker can be very clearly identified.

I am also told that Wayman Bennett of the criminal conspiracy operation ‘Unite Against Fascism’ addressed the same rally and said, among other provocative statements that “Israeli Jews should go back to wherever they came from – New York or wherever it is”. I have not seen this footage myself, but urge that you also investigate this.

As the Gold Commander during the 1981 Burnley riots, you must have a very good appreciation of the very serious danger involved here, with outside agitators doing their very best to increase tensions in Blackburn. Should the situation in Gaza not be permanently resolved very soon, it is highly likely that Ms Booth’s call for a far larger demonstration in the town will be answered. That being the case, it is vital if the peace is to be maintained and the law upheld that the police force take action now to show that incitement to racial hatred and violence is unacceptable not only if the alleged victims are Pakistani Muslims, but also members of other races and religions.

I look forward to hearing that you have set in motion the appropriate action very shortly, not least because – as my analysis which accompanies the video makes clear – we do not have much time left in which to damp down the growing hysteria and alienation being produced by agitators such as Ms Booth.

Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin

PO Box 14
Welshpool
Powys
SY21 0WE

13 Responses to Nick Griffin v the “Anti-Fascist” Anti-Semites

  1. So….

    Are we supposed to support Lauren Booth’s free-speech rights againt fascist attack? Or Nick Griffin’s posturing against “hate speech” (another turkey lines up for an early Christmas)? Neither? Both?

    Or should this street theatre be reviewed by our Arts Editor? >:-}

    Best,

    Tony

  2. I’ll be interested to see what Steve Finnigan says. I french-polished his dining-table and fireplace about a year ago, after a builder had accidentally caused water damage, something to do with pierced pipes….

  3. He’s a nice guy, and also a St John’s-Cantab man – probably knows Griffin from Uni. They’re not so different in age. Could be interesting.

  4. Steven Northwood

    Griffin’s got a thankless task, that’s for sure, what with a decades-long ideological millstone around his neck.

    He’s right though, it should be one law for all, and when this letter comes to nothing – which it almost certainly will – it’ll be yet more proof of the failings of the Police and CPS in being racially impartial.

    All it means overall is that some people will be able to get away with it, and some people will not. He’s no Cicero though, Griffin, and if he could get away with it, he probably would.

  5. Yep. Griffin’s really a lefty anyway, just like the buggers who want “Israel Out”. But at least he’s trying to be ideologically consistent. And perhaps he’ll morph into a Classical liberal as he grows up, which the Unite crew and the pro-Palestinian* mob will never ever ever do.

    *Palestine: a theoretical Gramsco-Marxian siege-construction, which has not real existence and is being used as a phantasmal stalking-horse for leftist anti-liberalism. (I’m sure Tony H will bite my ankles later tonight, for this.)

  6. So do you prefer the Zionists then? Have you ever considered that there may not be any ‘good guys’ involved in the Israel-Palestine conflict? Or does your reductionistic, black-and-white libertarian doctrine blind you from such realities.

    I seem to hear alot of demands for an Israel/ Palestine “stretching from river to sea”, which is another way of saying push the Jews/ Arabs into the sea…there are alot of crazy people on both sides (I don’t feel its either my right or place to judge which nation, if any is the ‘most responsible’ and nor should people feel obliged to ‘side’ with one or the other).

    P.S. What does this whole affair have to do with Gramsci or Marxism? May I ask Mr Davis why he feels the need to constantly fit an anti-marxist remark into every one of his posts?

  7. Because they are responsible for (almost) all the major problems civilisation faces.

  8. Also, this is not one of my posts! (My name’s not at the top of it….er….)

  9. “Atque insuper, Carthago delenda est!”

    And now, I fully expect to get tarred-and-feathered by some libertarian or other who will state that Carthage was liberal and free-market, while 3rd-century-BC Rome was statist…..

  10. Dave:

    Market-oriented, but not liberal.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthage

    Best,

    Tony

  11. Dave:

    What you don’t seem to understand is that — as Marx wrote it – Marxism is not a political programme. Marxism claims to be a predictive science, just as Darwin’s evolution was advanced as science.

    Hence, a true Marxist may or may not _welcome_ the advent of socialism and communism; but this makes no difference to the validity of the theory. An astronomer may or may not welcome the sun rising each morning: but rise it will, come Hell or high water.

    Much of the impetus for anti-trust and anti-monopoly legislation came from the belief that monopolization would hasten the advent of socialism. It is quite possible to be convinced by Marxism, yet _hate_ socialism and communism.

    If you fail to understand this, you fail to understand the enormous appeal of the Marxist slogan: “Help to bring about the inevitable!”

    Of course, many of Marxism’s predictions have been falsifed. The Economic Calculation debate leaves Marxist theory in ruins.

    “Socialism” and “Marxism” are different things — apples and oranges. “Socialism” is an imaginary form of ideal society: Marxism is a scientific theory.

    Best,

    Tony

  12. Dave:

    And your own quest for a ‘liberal’ intellectual hegemony is pure Gramsci! As was Chris Tame’s…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramsci

    And I’m a fan of some of Henri Bergson’s ideas… Being something of a “Popper boi…”

    Best,

    Tony

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s