How big are stars and planets, relative to each other?

David Davis and Peter Davis

Eat dust, socialists! You are nothing: you are less than a  couple of squamous-cells, scraped off the scrofula of a dried scumbag which time forgot in the back of the fridge…..the Earth and its changing climate will go on willy-nilly without you. And there are far, far larger forces interacting out there, which don’t take account of you at all. You are “not serious” (as Stalin would have stated: you have not shot any Bishops or Cardinals yet.)

And don’t be going getting any ideas about how important even the Sun is, from this one either!

This is quite cool:-

…..so down to the micro level, and how on earth do you calculate all that stuff here?…..:-

…..and this is quite extraordinary:-

What his dad is trying to say here is that Man is The Lord of Creation, in default of the arrival of God, which may not be Anytime Soon, as things stand.

And God saw what man had done in his hubristic wind/fart-turbine-ness, and lo, He Was Wroth

David Davis

And yea, verily did God smite the false turbines in His Anger, to teach Man a lesson about “fossil fuels” which God had Laid Before Man Without Let Or Hinderance.

And God said: “Men: why hast ye pandered, in despite of my strictures and manuals (RTFM) to the energetics of the Devil, when all you saddo buggers had to do was pump out of the ground the stuff I furnished you with?  C***s. “

I’m sure that actually it’s due to the Flying-Spaghetti-Monster.

I now know what “Twitter” is, and what “Twitterati” are.

David Davis

I learned it here, although I expect I will score “nul points”, since Bryony Gordon was my source, and she was slightly less positive about it than the Twitterati might like, and I’m a bit cynical too.

Who cares what I’m doing right now? Or even what you are doing, reader. Piss off back to your work. Perhaps it’s none of anybody’s effing business either.

I would like to publish in a few years:-

“They spotted a gap in the market, and fell smartly to their deaths through it.”

Wealth is good, but rich young overgrown boy writes off Ferrari. How shall we stop socialists from going tut-tut and pointing guns?

David Davis

A person described as a “Foot Ballist” has written off his Ferrari. Very publicly.

It’s OK, don’t worry, for he owns at least five other motor vehicles. But this sort of thing encourages soclialists, Nazis and other compulsory-redistributivists to say things like “people don’t need more than one car (at most)” and “there should be more speed cameras”, and “there should be a fully-integrated public transport system” (subtext for “no private motoring”)…etc.

My problem is that the media-driven-sensationalising of the wasteful and expensive misdeeds of a few overgrown and unsocialised boys, leads to a general zeitgeist in which wealth and success (of any sort, however gained) is viewed increasingly darkly.

This is not good for libertarianism, since we are a philosophy which avers that all can and ought to be able to share in an increasing cake. Of course, any human being ought to be free to crash his expensive car as often as he likes (provided he does not harm anyone in so doing.) But we’re all supposed to be eating sack-cloth and ashes at present, so this will just enrage the doo-gooders more.