(Reheated) I should have thought that the answer is obvious


David Davis

Editor’s Note: this was published on 4th January 2009, at the height of the “New Labour” GramscoFabiaNazi Terror. A rather strangely forbidding and humourless man called “Jacqui Smith” was the Interior-Minister…I think. This person liked to state on the wireless-tele vision that people would come up to him in the street and ask when they could have something called an “identity card”.

The current lot in power, the LabLebLibLobLubCon “coalition” have done less than one hoped to reverse the creeping tide of police-terror overcoming us here.

The prospects for liberty in the UK continue to remain poor.

Philip Johnston asks “why is Labour so keen to imprison us?

So were Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Castro (who will continue to remain dead, thank God) Kim Jong-Il, Mao, Ho (ho ho) Chi Mhinh,  and the rest. I bet that if you asked ShootinPutin187 how many people he ought to imprison, then his list would be longer than mine or yours.

The only people to imprison are those who seriously violate, beyind the bounds of sensible argument, people’s natural Rights, which are to one’s life, liberty or justly acquired property. This could include a large and increasing majority of British politicians and bureaucrats, psychologically egged-on but not necessarily overtly supported by, those in the EU.

Given that these people-troids – the British ones anyway – spend a large percentage of their time manufacturing (on purpose) petty criminals who violate life and property directly, such as robbers, muggers, burglars, rapists, car-keyers, knifers, ne’er-do-wells and rievers of all types, by purposefully designing “school” “syllabuses” which selectively disadvantage young boys and men, then these troids are the people who ought to inhabit prisons first and for the longest times. I designed a prison a little while ago, just for them. Here it is again.

About these ads

6 responses to “(Reheated) I should have thought that the answer is obvious

  1. Pingback: Jump in feet-first, you fool « bella gerens

  2. You seem to have omitted all the soi-disant “private” violators of Rights, who are as the multitudinous seas incarnadine,

    WHY do “Capitalists” ALWAYS make this deliberate “mistake”???

    I need to know…

    Tony

  3. Pingback: bella gerens » Blog Archive » Jump in feet-first, you fool

  4. you would get upset too if it was Defamation of Your Good Name
    William Sakespear is a Gay Fag Wanker The Compleate Work of William Shakespear only Teaches Who to have a Violent Abusive Tormented Relationship Mariage ending Death Destruction &Devorce Why Would Validate That kindred Shite and expect your children to turn out ok.

  5. The above reply from “Tony Hollick” was not posted by this Tony Hollick

    Tony Hollick

  6. Not this year, anyway. The reply is dated 2009 with a URL which is no longer valid. I may have posted it some years ago.

    Tony Hollick