David Davis
I can’t speak for the Libertarian Alliance’s members as a whole (and I would never presume to do so!) but we the Officers are generally persuaded that “Militant Islam” - or indeed even just plain vanilla unleaded Islam, as practised more or less harmlessly by most Moslems - is not the severe existential threat to Western Civilisation that our temporal “masters” in the, er, West thump the table about. We think they (our , er, “masters”….hurrrumph…make a suitable skeptical face here) do this in order to impose ever-more-draconian restrictions on our freedom and (worse) our thoughts and langauge in the course of, er, ordinary discourse.
Activities of this kind, by “masters”, constitute a part of the process of de-reasoning called “Political Correctness“.
The real threat to This Civilisation is really the evil scheming toads who have been through Western Universities after the Gramsco-Eagletonian march through them by the socialist left. Most of them now have political power in the West, for that was (and IS) for them the whole point of their existence. There are indeed many, shocking though it may seem to real people in real countries, who have never had what you and I would call a “job”: they have gone seamlessly into the state bureaucracy after graduating, and have ended up as bureaucrats or stuff like MPs or “representatives”. These people have been corrupted into the human equivalent of Orcs (who as Tolkien students know were all made by Morgoth and his servants, in the Image of Elves) and as God gave Man the gift of Free Will, then it’s quite apparent that these people have therefore unquestionably chosen to do Evil freely, instead of to do Good.
However, there are even some evil toads labouring under Islam. Probably not as many as we have on our side, but irritating all the same.
This was on a hat-tip from Girl on the Right (see blogroll) and explains in a good Western way what is going on in Canada right now. Humour and ridicule directed towards your enemy is the cardinal weapon of Western liberal spin and propaganda (oh yes, we must have some too - it’s only fair) against unfathomable evil, and should be used more and more.
For Life, Liberty and Property
5 responses so far ↓
Tony Hollick // 7 May, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Dave:
What percentage of the population would self-identify as “Gramsco-Eagetonians” if asked in an opinion poll?
Is there a Diagnostic Checklist for this condition? That way, untutored souls like me could start to work out who the “enemy” is.
I don’t think I’ve ever actually met one.
I have on the other hand had unpleasant encounters with Right Wing Authoritarians - Times readers, Sun readers and Daily Mail readers.
Do tell!
Regards,
Tony
David Davis // 7 May, 2008 at 9:10 pm
I don’t know, Tony.
But although I guess that about 0.09213% would affirm that position, something like 8.0469% of adults over the age of 17 actually ought to if they were being honest, and if they knew what it meant. I’m sure Polly Toynbee (for example) would say that she was one, if “pressed”.
And what’s wrong with Sun readers? I can sort of identify with your position re the moley dail (two-health-scares-a-week…the govt must “do more”
but that’s a left-wing position anyway…..er….? Isn’t it?
Dunno about the Times. I don’t read it, finding it as I do rather unhelpful.
Fond best, DD
Tony Hollick // 7 May, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Dave:
I still need a Diagnostic Checklist to help me identify these Gramscian-Eagletonians. You must have some idea what their core dogmas are, for you to be able to identify them.
I didn’t mean to suggest that all Sun readers were Right Wing Authoritarians (though many of them must be, judging by the content). My experience includes bad experiences with people who were Sun readers. That’s all.
The Sun purveys Vulgar Murdochism, whereas the Times purveys a more sophisticated Murdochism. A bit like the BNP and UKIP.
For a while, I had a little job which involved putting the cod-wrappers on display for the customers. After spending some time reading the damn things, I realized that I just couldn’t do it with a good conscience. The “pissing in the swimming pool” sort of thing…
Best,
Tony
Tony Hollick // 8 May, 2008 at 12:24 am
Dave:
To illustrate the issue, ask yourself how much of this were you aware of? On the cruel 7/7 hoax.
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-4943675105275097719&hl=en-GB
Regards,
Tony
thenonconformer // 10 May, 2008 at 6:58 pm
I really still rightfully do not think that Ezra pursues, or believes in the Charter right of free speech for any one now but himself, not most any others,
and he just seems not to mind bashing, bullying, slandering the Muslims as a Jew?
and also anyone who does not go along with the very inadequate Albertan Conservatives too, as I had often seen firsthand, evident on his Alberta site..
No one can now or should really take him seriously as a free speech advocate?
Not when he clearly does not respect others Human rights?
That is why they call him and the others like him Albertan rednecks still.
Leave a Comment