Come on! You nasty leftist toads.
Get the gloves out, and fight us if you dare.
Bastards. Killers. Morgoth. Bad. You will be dead one day, and then what? What did you do what you did, for, and why?
You want global warming to be believed, because you want to hobble us, who create wealth and stuff.
You want to do that because otherwise there will be no poor people left on the planet for you to patronize, and pretend to beat us with, so you bastards can have jobs, in case we lose concentration for a moment and agree with you that their poverty is our fault.
Our fault? Why? WE, not you, defined their poverty as hideous, and we showed what would be achieved instead, and you did not.
Why did we do that? We were trying to help them before you had even heard of them, because we are Christian liberals, which is to say, conservatives. We even had boats and regarded the Sea as a Road and not a Fence or a Wall, but your “philosophers” lived in “Europe” and were land-bound. In this difference I think lies one of the roots of Anglosphere-libertarianism. Our borders are wherever a boat can make landfall, but yours are just…fences and walls. I’m so sorry, but there it is. It’s an epistemological difference in how a human perceives reality.
Why do so many libertarians like SF?
The continual poverty of “the people” is your fault (you socialists, youlot, you bastards, evil doers, shysters, Brown-cabinet-ministers, ne’er-do-wells, vote-riggers and wastrels) for hobbling and burdening us, in our travails, so we can’t help them, despite you lot.
UPDATE 15th April 2008 … And here’s another example of nazi bullyboy pressure on normal people to say “the right things” ….
Climate change – From Christopher Booker’s column Sunday Telegraph 13th April (It’s the second item in his poly-column, which links below:)
A talking point among “climate sceptics” on both sides of the Atlantic
has been the bizarre tale of how the BBC’s chief reporter on climate
change censored an item on the BBC website after being harried by a
I don’t know what you think of that report but the behaviour of that Jo Abbess droid is disgusting.
ITEM: Why are so many British lefty “femdroids” called “Jo”? This is not the first time I have encountered one. they also write unsuitably politically-correct children’s books. Are they trying to look matey and “street”, or do they get to become lefties because of their parents’ inclinations which lead towards a certain sort of girl’s name?