Ummmm ….. nothing exceptionable.
He said that the private possession of something ought not to be illegal. He did __NOT__ say he was in favour of it. He is a libertarian; we tend to have well-thought-out policy-positions based on logic and reason. (See, also, the UK Libertarian Party. I personally am glad that there now is such an institution, although the LA has always held a broadly friendly but opposite view.)
Sean is well out of that shower. Although you have to sympathise with a fledgeling party like UKIP, which could become more important in the years to come, as darkness overwhelms us, and which does NOT want to be targeted by Rebekah-Wade-inspired mobs who think all its officers are paediatricians.
For Life, Liberty and Property
4 responses so far ↓
ex LA member // 13 March, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Don’t you mean exceptional?
A paediatrician is a doctor who specialises in treating children. Don’t you mean paedophiles?
I am well out of the LA - it’s run by idiots!
Bishop Hill // 13 March, 2008 at 7:07 pm
ex-LA member
“Don’t you mean paedophiles”
Good grief, where have you been?
David Davis // 13 March, 2008 at 9:20 pm
I am quite well aware of that story you highlight. That is exactly why I referred to it in my text.
“and which does NOT want to be targeted by Rebekah-Wade-inspired mobs who think all its officers are paediatricians.”
Nero // 14 March, 2008 at 11:41 am
I heard a few years back that it was state-inspired, a sort of pressure-valve. I don’t know. I dare say there’s some really good people in it, but to be honest I doubt it could ever combine the qualities to acheive long-term success.
Oh I mean the UKIP by the way, not the LA blog. Sorry Dave!
Leave a Comment